WEBVTT

00:00:04.519 --> 00:00:08.460
A news network that's been part of American radio

00:00:08.460 --> 00:00:12.339
for nearly a century is shutting down. And somehow

00:00:12.339 --> 00:00:15.699
we're just supposed to nod along like that's

00:00:15.699 --> 00:00:19.300
a normal Tuesday. CBS News Radio is done on May

00:00:19.300 --> 00:00:23.960
22nd. 700 affiliates gone. Every job on the radio

00:00:23.960 --> 00:00:27.480
team eliminated. And look, I want to be upfront

00:00:27.480 --> 00:00:30.640
about something before we get into this. This

00:00:30.640 --> 00:00:33.710
is an actual news story here. Sure. and I'll

00:00:33.710 --> 00:00:35.929
give you the facts, but a lot of what I'm about

00:00:35.929 --> 00:00:39.090
to say is also just my opinion and frankly how

00:00:39.090 --> 00:00:42.789
annoyed I am about all of it. So fair warning.

00:00:43.750 --> 00:00:45.670
This is the Tyler Woodward Project and today

00:00:45.670 --> 00:00:48.969
I'm talking about the shutdown of CBS News Radio.

00:00:49.590 --> 00:00:51.990
Why it's bigger than one brand disappearing and

00:00:51.990 --> 00:00:54.710
why the changes at Paramount look less like a

00:00:54.710 --> 00:00:58.929
smart reset and more like another round of expensive

00:00:58.929 --> 00:01:07.629
management vandalism. So, if you're not deep

00:01:07.629 --> 00:01:10.189
in the broadcast world, this might read as one

00:01:10.189 --> 00:01:12.510
of those inside baseball things where a bunch

00:01:12.510 --> 00:01:15.629
of radio nerds get sentimental over an old network

00:01:15.629 --> 00:01:19.810
queue. I get it. I do. But that's genuinely not

00:01:19.810 --> 00:01:24.950
what this is. CBS News Radio was not some dusty

00:01:24.950 --> 00:01:27.430
relic sitting in a corner because nobody got

00:01:27.430 --> 00:01:30.689
around to unplugging the thing. It was working.

00:01:31.390 --> 00:01:33.709
Stations were using it. It was doing what it

00:01:33.709 --> 00:01:38.670
was built to do. And that's what makes this so

00:01:38.670 --> 00:01:41.750
frustrating because there's a difference between

00:01:41.750 --> 00:01:45.230
something being old and something being obsolete.

00:01:46.290 --> 00:01:50.170
A lot of media executives seem to have stopped

00:01:50.170 --> 00:01:55.049
caring about that distinction. Here's the thing

00:01:55.049 --> 00:01:59.030
about network radio services that people outside

00:01:59.030 --> 00:02:03.790
the industry really don't get. The most valuable

00:02:03.790 --> 00:02:07.939
parts are usually the least glamorous. Nobody's

00:02:07.939 --> 00:02:10.620
going to make a documentary about a clean top

00:02:10.620 --> 00:02:12.979
of the hour newscast. Nobody's pitching that

00:02:12.979 --> 00:02:18.659
as a content strategy. But local radio stations

00:02:18.659 --> 00:02:22.800
were built around it. They build clocks around

00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:25.840
it. They build staffing decisions around it.

00:02:26.099 --> 00:02:31.020
They build audience habit around it. It's infrastructure.

00:02:31.219 --> 00:02:34.300
It's not supposed to be sexy. It's supposed to

00:02:34.300 --> 00:02:37.539
work and When it works it makes the whole station

00:02:37.539 --> 00:02:41.319
feel like an actual station instead of a Spotify

00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:44.960
playlist with a transmitter attached to it So

00:02:44.960 --> 00:02:48.199
when CBS says this is all about quote -unquote

00:02:48.199 --> 00:02:51.659
challenging economic realities and quote -unquote

00:02:51.659 --> 00:02:54.400
a shift in radio station programming strategies

00:02:54.400 --> 00:02:59.530
Sure, I hear that I also hear the translation,

00:03:00.449 --> 00:03:03.969
and the translation is this. This stopped fitting

00:03:03.969 --> 00:03:08.449
the spreadsheet. Which fine, I know radio economics

00:03:08.449 --> 00:03:12.770
in 2026 is not great. I know everybody is under

00:03:12.770 --> 00:03:15.370
pressure. I know every media company right now

00:03:15.370 --> 00:03:17.949
is desperately trying to be younger, leaner,

00:03:18.129 --> 00:03:21.490
digital first, platform native, synergized, and

00:03:21.490 --> 00:03:24.310
whatever other stupid buzzword get invented in

00:03:24.310 --> 00:03:27.520
the boardroom last Tuesday. None of that is new.

00:03:28.580 --> 00:03:31.099
But this doesn't look like a tough call made

00:03:31.099 --> 00:03:35.080
by people who actually agonized over it. This

00:03:35.080 --> 00:03:38.719
looks like part of a pattern. Axios reported

00:03:38.719 --> 00:03:43.099
that this is the second wave of job cuts since

00:03:43.099 --> 00:03:46.960
Skydance acquired Paramount last year. Same stretch

00:03:46.960 --> 00:03:51.479
of time, Paramount buys Barry Weiss's free press

00:03:51.479 --> 00:03:54.560
and installs her as the editor in chief of CBS

00:03:54.560 --> 00:03:58.810
News. Business Insider reported that Weiss told

00:03:58.810 --> 00:04:04.729
staff at CBS News that CBS News would be toast

00:04:04.729 --> 00:04:08.550
if it kept leaning on broadcast television. And

00:04:08.550 --> 00:04:12.069
that the focus should be on reporting people

00:04:12.069 --> 00:04:15.710
can't get anywhere else. And again, in theory,

00:04:16.009 --> 00:04:19.290
I don't hate that argument. Sure, be distinctive.

00:04:19.870 --> 00:04:22.170
Be different. Don't just churn out the same stuff

00:04:22.170 --> 00:04:25.639
everybody else is already churning out. But here's

00:04:25.639 --> 00:04:29.800
the thing Network radio affiliate services. They're

00:04:29.800 --> 00:04:32.379
not so they're not it's not where you apply that

00:04:32.379 --> 00:04:37.579
logic a top of the hour newscast isn't Competing

00:04:37.579 --> 00:04:41.360
on exclusivity. It's not trying to be distinctive.

00:04:41.379 --> 00:04:46.079
It's trying to be reliable consistent operationally

00:04:46.079 --> 00:04:50.750
useful the value is that it's there, it sounds

00:04:50.750 --> 00:04:53.149
right, and the station can count on it every

00:04:53.149 --> 00:04:57.670
single hour without any drama. That's a completely

00:04:57.670 --> 00:05:01.269
different value proposition than what Weiss seems

00:05:01.269 --> 00:05:04.410
to be describing, and I think conflating the

00:05:04.410 --> 00:05:06.790
two is how you end up killing something that

00:05:06.790 --> 00:05:13.050
was still working. And okay, here's where I get

00:05:13.050 --> 00:05:17.259
really annoyed. I've heard from other engineers

00:05:17.259 --> 00:05:20.639
that some affiliates didn't even get a real heads

00:05:20.639 --> 00:05:23.800
up before the press release dropped. They basically

00:05:23.800 --> 00:05:27.139
found out at the same time as the general public.

00:05:28.839 --> 00:05:32.220
Now, CBS's own internal memo says the announcement

00:05:32.220 --> 00:05:35.879
timing was tied to obligations requiring advance

00:05:35.879 --> 00:05:40.519
notice to radio partners. So, the official position

00:05:40.519 --> 00:05:43.740
is we met our commitments. Everything was handled.

00:05:44.180 --> 00:05:49.829
Check. But if people on the station side were

00:05:49.829 --> 00:05:52.350
sitting there going wait I'm reading this on

00:05:52.350 --> 00:05:55.829
the internet with everyone else right now Then

00:05:55.829 --> 00:05:59.149
that's not partner communication. That's a press

00:05:59.149 --> 00:06:02.209
release with a legal disclaimer stapled to it

00:06:02.209 --> 00:06:06.889
And if that's really how it went down that is

00:06:06.889 --> 00:06:12.050
zero fucks given Because that's the insult on

00:06:12.050 --> 00:06:16.529
top of the injury Killing the service is bad

00:06:16.529 --> 00:06:21.490
enough, but finding out about it in public, alongside

00:06:21.490 --> 00:06:24.949
the journalist writing the story, is a whole

00:06:24.949 --> 00:06:28.709
extra message. And the message was, you're not

00:06:28.709 --> 00:06:32.149
partners, you're just downstream. You find out

00:06:32.149 --> 00:06:37.649
when everybody else finds out. Radio is a relationship

00:06:37.649 --> 00:06:41.610
business, always has been. You can automate the

00:06:41.610 --> 00:06:44.459
plant, virtualize everything in existence, move

00:06:44.459 --> 00:06:48.040
it all into the cloud, throw the word scalable

00:06:48.040 --> 00:06:51.899
around until everyone in the room goes, ooh,

00:06:52.180 --> 00:06:57.300
ah. And at the end of the day, it still runs

00:06:57.300 --> 00:07:02.399
on trust. Operators need to know you're going

00:07:02.399 --> 00:07:04.839
to tell them what's changing before they read

00:07:04.839 --> 00:07:09.000
about it online. Once that's gone, you're just

00:07:09.000 --> 00:07:11.720
a vendor. and not even a vendor people feel good

00:07:11.720 --> 00:07:15.439
about. The human cost on all of this is real

00:07:15.439 --> 00:07:20.180
too. CBS is cutting roughly 6 % of its workforce

00:07:20.180 --> 00:07:23.639
alongside the radio shutdown, somewhere around

00:07:23.639 --> 00:07:29.600
60 to 66 people. These are newsroom people who

00:07:29.600 --> 00:07:33.459
built something that lasted almost 100 years

00:07:33.459 --> 00:07:36.759
and still get told they were in the way of the

00:07:36.759 --> 00:07:41.550
future. The Writers Guild of America East didn't

00:07:41.550 --> 00:07:44.490
hold back either. They called the shutdown a

00:07:44.490 --> 00:07:49.790
sign of, quote, inept leadership, unquote, from

00:07:49.790 --> 00:07:53.329
Barry Weiss and Paramount CEO David Ellison.

00:07:54.529 --> 00:07:59.069
Unions aren't neutral, obviously, but also when

00:07:59.069 --> 00:08:01.810
the, quote, unquote, future keeps showing up

00:08:01.810 --> 00:08:05.029
as fewer services, smaller newsrooms, and less

00:08:05.029 --> 00:08:08.699
support for local operators. It's getting really

00:08:08.699 --> 00:08:13.860
hard to take that word at face value. Because

00:08:13.860 --> 00:08:17.120
what is the actual output here? It's not some

00:08:17.120 --> 00:08:20.439
exciting new model for public service journalism.

00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:23.620
It's not a stronger relationship with local stations.

00:08:23.899 --> 00:08:28.079
It's not a better radio product. The output is

00:08:28.079 --> 00:08:30.980
that one of the oldest radio news services in

00:08:30.980 --> 00:08:35.600
the country is dead. Hundreds of affiliates are

00:08:35.600 --> 00:08:38.950
scrambling right now. and a few dozen more people

00:08:38.950 --> 00:08:43.129
on the journalism side of things are out of work.

00:08:44.769 --> 00:08:49.210
Call it adaptation, call it transformation, call

00:08:49.210 --> 00:08:54.490
it strategic pivot toward future audiences. Media

00:08:54.490 --> 00:08:59.389
executives really do love naming the knife. But

00:08:59.389 --> 00:09:02.710
from where I'm sitting, It looks like management

00:09:02.710 --> 00:09:06.330
deciding that anything unglamorous is expandable

00:09:06.330 --> 00:09:10.549
because it doesn't generate enough buzz. And

00:09:10.549 --> 00:09:14.190
that's the problem. Because the unglamorous stuff

00:09:14.190 --> 00:09:17.110
is often what actually holds everything else

00:09:17.110 --> 00:09:21.309
together. Will affiliates find replacements?

00:09:21.909 --> 00:09:26.230
Yeah, sure. They will. Radio always finds a workaround.

00:09:26.649 --> 00:09:29.169
Engineers patch around broken things all the

00:09:29.169 --> 00:09:32.340
time. Operators rebuild their clocks before the

00:09:32.340 --> 00:09:35.799
week is out. That's just what the industry does.

00:09:36.419 --> 00:09:40.159
And honestly, it's really remarkable. But that

00:09:40.159 --> 00:09:42.779
resilience shouldn't become a blank check for

00:09:42.779 --> 00:09:47.279
corporate to keep blowing things up. They'll

00:09:47.279 --> 00:09:51.440
figure it out. That's not a strategy. It's a

00:09:51.440 --> 00:09:55.799
confession. Here's where I land on this. I'm

00:09:55.799 --> 00:09:59.600
not saying CBS Newsradio was perfect. I'm not

00:09:59.600 --> 00:10:02.919
saying radio never changes. I'm not waving a

00:10:02.919 --> 00:10:07.320
flag for every legacy institution just because

00:10:07.320 --> 00:10:13.539
it's old. I'm saying this was a functioning service

00:10:13.539 --> 00:10:16.740
with real distribution, real affiliates, and

00:10:16.740 --> 00:10:22.519
real utility. And CBS's own coverage acknowledged

00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:26.559
it as part of the company's legacy, even as they

00:10:26.559 --> 00:10:30.799
shut it down. That's not an artifact. That's

00:10:30.799 --> 00:10:33.960
a live system somebody chose to stop supporting

00:10:33.960 --> 00:10:39.200
in the way They chose to stop supporting it the

00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:42.600
second wave of cuts the affiliate Communication

00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:45.440
the broader direction under the new ownership

00:10:45.440 --> 00:10:49.340
tells you something about what paramount actually

00:10:49.340 --> 00:10:55.080
values right now Sometimes decline doesn't show

00:10:55.080 --> 00:10:58.690
up as some big dramatic collapse Sometimes it's

00:10:58.690 --> 00:11:01.850
a memo, some corporate language about strategy,

00:11:02.509 --> 00:11:05.850
affiliates finding out from a press release on

00:11:05.850 --> 00:11:09.750
whatever industry news website, and a May shutdown

00:11:09.750 --> 00:11:14.450
date for something that still mattered. And honestly,

00:11:14.450 --> 00:11:16.929
that might be the most radio thing about this

00:11:16.929 --> 00:11:19.330
whole story. The people who actually understood

00:11:19.330 --> 00:11:23.850
its value were probably never the ones holding

00:11:23.850 --> 00:11:28.169
the knife. I'm Tyler. This is the Tyler Woodward

00:11:28.169 --> 00:11:31.029
Project. Follow me on threads of bluesky at tylerwoodward

00:11:31.029 --> 00:11:34.009
.me. You can also find me on Instagram at tylerwoodward

00:11:34.009 --> 00:11:36.889
.me. And make sure you head over to tylerwoodward

00:11:36.889 --> 00:11:39.690
.me. Got a brand new website up there. You can

00:11:39.690 --> 00:11:41.649
check it out. Send me a message. Let me know

00:11:41.649 --> 00:11:44.590
your thoughts. Make sure you like and subscribe

00:11:44.590 --> 00:11:48.450
on Apple Podcast or Spotify or YouTube or Amazon

00:11:48.450 --> 00:11:50.529
Music, wherever you're listening. Leave a review.

00:11:50.710 --> 00:11:54.830
I hear that helps. We'll see. I'll catch you

00:11:54.830 --> 00:11:55.269
next time.